Industry Benchmarks — Your Digital Partner
Industry benchmarks

What good looks like — and what it costs when it doesn't

These are the numbers that define performance in the Australian retirement living sector. Most operators know something is off. These benchmarks tell you exactly where.

A · Sales cycle

Average Sales Cycle Duration

Industry benchmark 12–24 months

The insight

The transition to a retirement village is a highly emotional, multi-stage family decision. The prospect researches for months. The family has multiple conversations. The timing depends on health, finances, and confidence — not urgency.

Your Digital Partner

Generalist agencies stop retargeting after 30 days, assuming the lead is dead. We build 18-month nurture architectures to match the true length of the decision cycle — so you're still visible when the family is finally ready to act.

PwC–RLC Retirement Census, 2024

B · Waitlist health

Annual Waitlist Decay Rate

Industry benchmark 30% annual attrition

The insight

Without consistent engagement, nearly a third of a warm waitlist evaporates every year — prospects opt for home care, experience a health crisis, or choose a competitor who stayed top of mind. A waitlist is not a pipeline. It's a decaying asset.

Your Digital Partner

An automated engagement sequence plugs the 30% leak by keeping your waitlist warm through low-pressure, high-value content — without requiring a single manual touchpoint from your team.

Property Council of Australia

C · Lead acquisition cost

Cost Per Qualified Enquiry (CPA)

Industry avg. $85–$125
Target with direct < $45

The insight

Operators are heavily overpaying third-party directories — high monthly subscription fees or steep success commissions on move-ins. Every lead from an aggregator costs you twice: the fee, and a family who found a competitor first.

Your Digital Partner

By implementing local search capture and direct enquiry infrastructure, we target a sub-$45 CPA — keeping your pipeline 100% direct and commission-free.

Sector operator data, 2024–25

D · The golden window

Lead Response Time

Industry avg. 24–48h
Automation standard < 5 min

The insight

In 2026, the adult daughter researching for her parent is doing it at 9pm on a Sunday. If she requests a brochure and has to wait until Tuesday for a manual email, she has already moved on to whoever responded first.

Your Digital Partner

Immediate automated delivery of floor plans, village guides and next-step information the moment they click submit — regardless of when they enquire.

Harvard Business Review lead response study

E · Sector occupancy

National Village Occupancy Rate

2024 national benchmark 96% occupancy — record high

The insight

Australian retirement villages are effectively operating at full capacity — the highest occupancy rate since sector tracking began in 2014. Demand is structurally outpacing supply, with only 1,339 new ILUs delivered in 2024 against what's needed. The operators who convert enquiries efficiently win. The ones who don't are leaving waitlisted residents to choose competitors.

Your Digital Partner

At 96% occupancy, the competitive advantage is no longer about generating demand — it's about converting it faster than the village down the road. Speed and system quality determines who fills first.

Cushman & Wakefield Living Well Report, 2024

F · Resident tenure

Average Resident Tenure

Industry benchmark 8–9 years avg. stay

The insight

The average Australian enters a retirement village at 75 and stays for 8–9 years. Each resident represents significant long-term DMF revenue — meaning the financial cost of losing one prospect during a slow or broken enquiry process is far greater than the lost sale price alone.

Your Digital Partner

When you calculate the full DMF value of a resident who stays 8 years, the cost of a broken follow-up system isn't $0 — it's potentially hundreds of thousands per lost prospect. That's the real case for fixing the enquiry process.

PwC–Property Council Retirement Census, 2024

G · Resident satisfaction

Resident Net Promoter Score

Sector NPS benchmark +44 NPS — high satisfaction

The insight

Retirement village residents consistently report high satisfaction — a sector NPS of +44 is comparable to or better than many consumer sectors. The problem: most operators have no system for converting that satisfaction into digital reviews, referrals, or new enquiries. The asset exists. It's just not being used.

Your Digital Partner

A structured resident satisfaction-to-referral system turns your happiest residents into your most effective marketing channel — generating direct, commission-free enquiries from people who trust your community because they know someone in it.

DCM Institute / Property Council Research

Start with a Digital Diagnostic

See where your village sits against these benchmarks

Fixed price · $1,995 ex. GST · Results in 4 weeks

Book your Diagnostic →